TESTING WEAK FORM OF EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS ON SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INDICES: COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN DEVELOPED AND EMERGING MARKETS
Abstract
The study attempts to identify the presence of randomness in the socially responsible indices (SRI) of the stock markets of developed and emerging economies. 9 developed and 5 emerging economies were considered for the test of randomness on daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly and semiannual return of socially responsible and their benchmark indices. The Shapiro-Wilk test is used to test the data's normality, whereas the runs test and Augmented Dickey-Fuller test are used to find the randomness of the data. It has been observed that the market could be more efficient and random for all time durations. Most of the non-randomness is seen in daily and weekly returns. However, inefficiency disappears as the time frame increases. The combination of runs and ADF tests show that South Africa, Singapore, and South Korea show randomness for all time durations, whereas the same randomness pattern for Brazil, Australia, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. Arab, Austria, Germany, Nordic, and USA are not present in daily return and randomness for all other durations for both the test combinations. India and Egypt show non-randomness in daily and weekly returns and randomness for all other durations under the first test combination. It is also observed that most socially responsible investment indices resonate with the randomness patterns of benchmark indices. Socially responsible investors such as pension funds may find the article resourceful in identifying socially responsible investment destinations and diversifying their portfolios.
JEL Classification Codes: G32, F65, L66, L25, M41.
References
Alexander, S. S. (1961). Price movements in speculative markets: Trends or random walks. Industrial Management Review (pre-1986), 2(2), 7. Retrieved from http://history.technicalanalysis.org.uk/Alex64.pdf
Alexeev, V., & Tapon, F. (2011). Testing weak form efficiency on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(4), 661-691.
Althouse, L. A., Ware, W. B., & Ferron, J. M. (1998). Detecting Departures from Normality: A Monte Carlo Simulation of a New Omnibus Test Based on Moments.
Amenc, N., Goltz, F., & Tang, L. (2010). Adoption of green investing by institutional investors: a european survey. France: An EDHEC-Risk Institute.
Bachelier, L. (1964). Theory of Speculation, the Random Character of Stock Prices, translation of Bacheliers 1900 doctoral thesis.
Bhattacharjee, J., & Singh, R. (2017). Awareness about equity investment among retail investors: A kaleidoscopic view. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 9(4), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-04-2017-0036
Bordoloi, D., Singh, R., Bhattacharjee, J., & Bezborah, P. (2020). Assessing the awareness of Islamic law on equity investment in the state of Assam, India. Journal of Islamic Finance, 9(1), 001–012.
Borges, M. R. (2010). Efficient market hypothesis in European stock markets. The European Journal of Finance, 16(7), 711-726.
Clarke, J., Jandik, T., & Mandelker, G. (2001). The efficient markets hypothesis. Expert financial planning: Advice from industry leaders, 126-141.
Cooper, J. C. (1982). World stock markets: some random walk tests. Applied Economics, 14(5), 515–531.
Daskalakis, G., & Markellos, R. N. (2008). Are the European carbon markets efficient? Review of futures markets, 17(2), 103-128.
De Bondt, W. F., & Thaler, R. (1985). Does the stock market overreact? The Journal of Finance, 40(3), 793-805.
Deb, S., & Singh, R. (2018). Dynamics of risk perception towards mutual fund investment decisions. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 11(2), 407–424.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857.
Fama, E. F. (1965). The behavior of stock-market prices. The journal of Business, 38(1), 34–105.
Fama, E. F., & Blume, M. E. (1966). Filter rules and stock-market trading. The Journal of Business, 39(1), 226-241.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1988). Permanent and temporary components of stock prices. Journal of political Economy, 96(2), 246–273.
Frennberg, P., & Hansson, B. (1993). Testing the random walk hypothesis on Swedish stock prices: 1919–1990. Journal of Banking & Finance, 17(1), 175-191.
Geczy, C., Stambaugh, R., & Levin, D. (2005). Investing in socially responsible mutual funds.
Granger, C. W., & Morgenstern, O. (1963). Spectral analysis of New York stock market prices 1. Kyklos, 16(1), 1-27.
Grossman, S. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. The American economic review, 70(3), 393-408.
Guidi, F., & Gupta, R. (2011). Are ASEAN stock market efficient? Evidence from univariate and multivariate variance ratio tests. Discussion Papers in Finance, 201113, pp. 488–502.
Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 15-36.
Jensen, M. C. (1967). Random walks: reality or myth—comment. Financial Analysts Journal, 23(6), 77-85.
Jensen, M. C., & Benington, G. A. (1970). Random walks and technical theories: Some additional evidence. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 469-482.
Kajol, K., & Singh, R. (2022). Users' Awareness Towards Digital Financial Transactions: A Study Conducted in India. In International Working Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of I.T. (pp. 331-345). Springer, Cham
Kajol, K., Biswas, P., Singh, R., Moid, S., & Das, A. K. (2020). Factors affecting disposition effect in equity investment: A Social Network Analysis approach. International Journal of Accounting & Finance Review, 5(3), 64-86. https://doi.org/10.46281/ijafr.v5i3.845
Kajol, K., Nath, M., Singh, R., Singh, H. R., & Das, A. K. (2020). Factors affecting seasonality in the stock market: A social network analysis approach. International Journal of Accounting & Finance Review, 5(4), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.46281/ijafr.v5i4.888
Kajol, K., Singh, R., & Paul, J. (2022). Adoption of digital financial transactions: A review of literature and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 121991
Kempf, A., & Osthoff, P. (2007). The effect of socially responsible investing on portfolio performance. European Financial Management, 13(5), 908-922.
Kendal, M. (1953). The analysis of economic time series, part 1: prices. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 96(1), 11–25.
Kratz, O. S. (1999). Frontier emerging equity markets securities price behavior and valuation. Springer Science & Business Media.
Krishna Rao, N., & Mukherjee, K. (1971, January-July). Random-Walk Hypothesis: An Empirical Study. Arthaniti.
Levy, R. A. (1967). Random walks: Reality or myth. Financial Analysts Journal, 23(6), 69–77.
Lo, A. W. (2004). The adaptive markets hypothesis: Market efficiency from an evolutionary perspective.
Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1988). Stock market prices do not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test. The review of financial studies, 1(1), 41–66.
Malkiel, B. G. (2003). The efficient market hypothesis and its critics. Journal of economic perspectives, 17(1), 59-82.
Malkiel, B. G., & Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
Mynhardt, R., Makarenko, I., & Plastun, O. (2017). Market efficiency of traditional stock market indices and social responsible indices: The role of sustainability reporting.
Panas, E. (1990). The Behaviour of Athens Stock Prices Applied Economics. Applied Economics, p. 22, 1715-27.
Poterba, J. M., & Summers, L. H. (1988). Mean reversion in stock prices: Evidence and implications. Journal of financial economics, 22(1), 27-59.
Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. Journal of statistical modeling and analytics, 2(1), 21-33.
Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 302-322.
Sah, A. N. (2009). Stock market seasonality: A study of the Indian stock market. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract.
Sethi, S. P. (2005). Investing in socially responsible companies is a must for public pension funds–because there is no better alternative. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(2), 99–129.
Singh, R. (2012). Risk perception of Investors in initial public offer of shares: A psychometric study. Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/2153-3792.1131
SINGH, R. (2019). Behavioural finance. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
Singh, R., & Barman, H. (2011). Learning Investors Club. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Business Management, 2(1), 39–47.
Singh, R., & Bhattacharjee, D. (2010a). Equity Investment Decisions: Are Demographic Variables Really Significant? Paradigm, 14(1), 7–11.
Singh, R., & Bhattacharjee, D. (2010b). Impact of demographic variables on indirect equity investment: An empirical study. Indira Management Review, 4(1), 4–11.
Singh, R., & Bhattacharjee, J. (2019). Measuring equity share related risk perception of investors in economically backward regions. Risks, 7(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks7010012
Singh, R., & Bhowal, A. (2010). Imparting investment education to employees by the employer: an expectation-experience gap study. Amity Management Analyst, 5(2), 57–65.
Singh, R., & Bhowal, A. (2011). Development of marketing‐driven measure of risk perception. The Journal of Risk Finance, 12(2), 140–152.
Singh, R., & Bhowal, A. (2012). Marketing dimension of equity related risk perception of employees: Own company's shares vs. other company's shares. Management Insight, 6(2), 22–36.
Singh, R., & Das, S. (2013). Is Islamic equity index an investment heaven? A comparative study between SHA 50 and Nifty 50 of India. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 9(2), 103–114.
Singh, R., & Kar, H. (2011). Do the highly educated subscribers aware of it? New Pension Scheme in India. SIBACA Management Review, 1(1), 8-16.
Singh, R., & Leepsa, N. M. (2016). Feasibility of Investing in Carbon Efficient Equity Portfolios. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 12(2), 23–41.
Singh, R., Bhattacharjee J., K. K. (2022). Factors Affecting Awareness towards Investment In Equity Shares: A Social Network Analysis Approach. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 26(5), 1-14.
Singh, R., Bhattacharjee, J., & Kajol, K. (2021). Factors Affecting Risk Perception in Respect of Equity Shares: A Social Network Analysis Approach. Vision, 09722629211046082.
Singh, R., Leepsa, N. M., & Kushwaha, N. (2016). Testing the weak form of efficient market hypothesis in carbon efficient stock indices along with their benchmark indices in select countries. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 9(3), 627–650.
Statman, M., & Glushkov, D. (2009). The wages of social responsibility. Financial Analysts Journal, 65(4), 33–46.
UNT. (2014). Department of Geography. Retrieved from http://www.unt.edu/:http://geography.unt.edu/~wolverton/Normality %20Tests%20in%20SPSS.pdf, Accessed on 13 February 2015.
Urrutia, J. L. (1995). Tests of random walk and market efficiency for Latin American emerging equity markets. Journal of financial research, 18(3), 299-309.
Welford, R. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and Asia: Critical Elements and Best Practice. Journal of corporate citizenship, pp. 13, 31–47.
Worthington, A. C., & Higgs, H. (2005). Weak-form market efficiency in Asian emerging and developed equity markets: Comparative tests of random walk behaviour.
Yen, G., & Lee, C. F. (2008). Efficient market hypothesis (EMH): past, present and future. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 11(02), 305-329.
Copyright (c) 2022 Sabyasachi Mondal, Ranjit Singh, Vibha Yadav
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.