THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ATTRIBUTES AND AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE EFFICIENCY IN THE AVIATION INDUSTRIES IN OMAN

Keywords: Aircraft Maintenance, Resource Management, Effective Planning, Internal Control and Aviation Industry in Oman.

Abstract

The main purpose of the study is to investigate existing available literature for determining of relevant factors that have cause and effects on the ensuring of aircraft maintenance efficiency in the aviation industry in Oman. Therefore, the study uses available sources of existing literature based on the four main keywords ‘aircraft maintenance efficiency’, ‘aircraft maintenance and resource management attributes ‘or ‘effective planning and aircraft maintenance, and ‘internal control and aircraft maintenance, etc., and explored to covers from Google Scholar, ProQuest, and Scopus, and other online resources. The study also justified of above summary literature gap by the most relevant theories such as stakeholder, agency, and resource-based theories accordingly. Based on this extensive review, the study developed a conceptual framework, where effective planning and internal control have moderating role on the relationship between the resource management attributes and aircraft maintenance efficiency in the aviation industry in the sultanate of Oman. The summary review findings of the study will fill the gap in the existing body knowledge especially prime factors affecting the attainment of aircraft maintenance efficiency, resource management attributes, effective planning and ‘internal control and aircraft maintenance in the aviation industry in the sultanate of Oman. The study recommends to justify this conceptual framework by empirical data from the in the aviation industry in the sultanate of Oman and draw a policy guideline for ensuring of determining of relevant factors that have cause and effects on the ensuring of aircraft maintenance efficiency in the aviation industry in Oman.

 

Author Biographies

Said Hamed Al Rawahi, University of Selangor

PhD Research Fellow, Faculty of Business and Accountancy, University of Selangor, 40000 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

Zaharuzaman Bin Jamaluddin, University of Selangor

Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Business and Accountancy, University of Selangor, 40000 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

Abul Bashar Bhuiyan, University of Selangor

Associate Professor, Faculty of Business and Accountancy, University of Selangor, 40000 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

References

Adams, L., & Courtney, J. (2004). Achieving Relevance in IS Research via the DAGS Framework. 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii: IEEE.

Amaro, S., Abrantes, J. L., & Seabra, C. (2015b). Comparing CB-SEM and PLS-SEM results: an empirical example.

Anderson, E., & Richard, L. Oliver. (1987). Perspectives on Behavior-Based Versus Outcome-Based Salesforce Control Systems. Journal of Marketing, 51, 76-88.

Chatterjee, S., Tulu, B., Abhichandani, T., and Li (2005). H. SIP-based Enterprise Converged Network for Voice/Video over IP: Implementation and Evaluation of Components. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications - Recent Advances in Managing Enterprise Network Services, 23, 10.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of management review, 14(1), 57-74.

El Abboubi, M., & Nicolopoulou, K. (2012). International social-related accountability standards: using ANT towards a multi-stakeholder analysis. M@ n@ gement, 15(4), 392-414.

Evered, R. and Reis Louis, M. (2001) Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences: ‘Inquiry from the Inside’ And ‘Inquiry from the Outside, in Academy of Management Review, 6(3), 385-395.

Gallagher, D., Ting, L., & Palmer, A. (2008). A journey into the unknown; taking the fear out of structural equation modeling with AMOS for the first-time user. The Marketing Review, 8(3), 255-275.

Gefen, D., Rigdon, E. E., & Straub, D. (2011). Editor's comments: an update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. Mis Quarterly, iii-xiv.

Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T. L., & Walker, G. (2003). Guest editors' introduction to the special issue: why is there a resource‐based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 889-902.

Miles, J. A. (2012). Management and organization theory: A Jossey-Bass reader (Vol. 9): John Wiley & Sons.

Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, Sage publications,USA

Peteraf, M. A., & Barney, J. B. (2003). Unraveling the resource‐based tangle. Managerial and decision economics, 24(4), 309-323.

Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of management review, 26(1), 22-40.

Persson, S. (2004). Qualitative Methods in Software Engineering.

Sherwin, D. (2000). A review of overall models for maintenance management. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 6(3), 138-164.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Published
2020-10-14
How to Cite
Rawahi, S. H. A., Jamaluddin, Z. B., & Bhuiyan, A. B. (2020). THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ATTRIBUTES AND AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE EFFICIENCY IN THE AVIATION INDUSTRIES IN OMAN. International Journal of Accounting & Finance Review, 5(3), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.46281/ijafr.v5i3.808
Section
Research Paper/Theoretical Paper/Review Paper/Short Communication Paper