EVALUATING THE LEGAL REGULATION OF PROPERTY EXPECTATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
Main Article Content
Abstract
The protection of property expectations plays a crucial role in contemporary legal systems, particularly in the context of fulfilling contractual obligations. It promotes predictability and fairness in legal relations, establishing a framework for balancing private and public interests. In countries with transitional legal systems, such as Ukraine, property rights and contractual mechanisms face additional challenges as the global economy evolves. Given the difficulties outlined above, there is a pressing need for research into how legal systems adjust to the ever-changing political, social, and economic climates. Property expectations are essential for public policy, economic stability, and legal accountability. This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) of existing studies on legally controlled expectations of property, with a particular focus on works published between 2019 and 2024. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework utilized in this study ensures openness and completeness of the process for selecting, excluding, and reviewing relevant material. Research was limited by the review scope, which included only peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and conference papers, ensuring the quality and credibility of the SLR. The findings of this study highlight research gaps, particularly in relation to socio-environmental factors and legislative changes in transition economies. In contrast, the current study emphasizes the need for an interdisciplinary approach to address existing gaps. By analyzing contemporary literature, it aims to enhance understanding among researchers and legislators regarding the interplay between property rights and legal obligations.
JEL Classification Codes: K00, K11, K12, K33.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Allott, P. (2020). The Concept of International Law in Michael Byers (ed.), The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law (pp. 69-90). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244027.003.0005
Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., Samoliuk, N., & Yurchyk, H. (2020). Impact of income distribution on social and economic well-being of the state. Sustainability, 12(1), 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010429
Bondarenko, S., Shlafman, N., Kuprina, N., Kalaman, O., Moravska, O., & Tsurkan, N. (2021). Planning, Accounting and Control as Risk Management Tools for Small Business Investment Projects. Emerging Science Journal, 5(5), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2021-01302
Cotula, L. (2016). The future of global land grabbing: Realigning policy and rights. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.iied.org/g04091
Crawford, M. J. (2023). Contract as Property: Triangles and Tragic Choices. The Cambridge Law Journal, 82(1), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197322000903
Cutts, T. R. S. (2018). Modern money had and received. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 38(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqy002
Daniels, L. (2025a). How environmental laws affect property rights: understanding the legal implications. Retrieved from https://www.lubiterum.com/2024/11/how-environmental-laws-affect-property-rights-understanding-the-legal-implications
Daniels, L. (2025b). How judges create common law: understanding the role of judicial decisions in legal precedent. Retrieved from https://www.lubiterum.com/2024/11/how-judges-create-common-law-understanding-the-role-of-judicial-decisions-in-legal-precedent
Dei, M., Kobets, O., Honcharov, A., Tsekhmister, Y., & Shapovalovа, K. (2019). Effectiveness of the program for development of prosecutor’s ecological and legal consciousness. Asia Life Sciences, 10(21), 563–576. Retrieved from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43219128
Dziuba, A. Y. (2022). Legal regime of human organs and tissues as objects of civil law in the field of transplantation. Social and Legal Studios, 5(1), 51-56. https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2022-5-51-56
Graham, N. (2010). Lawscape: Property, Environment, Law. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847169
Graziadei, M., & Smith, L. (Eds.). (2017). Comparative property law: Global perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785369162
Hartley, T. C. (2015). Contractual rights and property interests – II. In Hartley, T. C. (Ed.) International Commercial Litigation. Text, Cases and Materials on Private International Law (pp. 821–848), Chapter 30. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316155776.033
Howe, H. R. (2016). Making wild law work – the role of ‘connection with nature’ and education in developing an ecocentric property law. Journal of Environmental Law, 29(1), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqw029
Hrushchynska, N., Shpak, L., Kovalev, V., & Shepel, T. (2024). Protection of intellectual property rights in economic activity. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 33(4), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2024.33.4.15-30
Iasechko, S., Zaitsev, O., Pokusa, F., Saienko, V., & Harashchuk, I. (2022). Legal regulation of intellectual property in sports. SPORT TK-EuroAmerican Journal of Sport Sciences, 11, 45. https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.526631
Kurafieieva, I., Khodyko, Y., & Dudenko, T. (2023). Construction of real estate with the involvement of individual funds: The Ukrainian experience. Journal of Property Management, 10(9), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.61275/ISVSej-2023-10-09-05
Lehavi, A. (2019). Why property law needs globalization strategies. In Lehavi, A (Ed.) Property Law in a Globalizing World (pp. 9–41). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595391.002
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Nizalov, D., Thornsbury, S., Loveridge, S., Woods, M., & Zadorozhna, O. (2016). Security of property rights and transition in land use. Journal of Comparative Economics, 44(1), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2015.09.005
Ojanen, M., Zhou, W., Miller, D. C., Nieto, S. H., Mshale, B., & Petrokofsky, G. (2017). What are the environmental impacts of property rights regimes in forests, fisheries, and rangelands? Environmental Evidence, 6(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-017-0090-2
Paryzkyi, I. V., Ivanchov, P. V., & Antonova, O. M. (2021). Privatisation in Ukraine as a deterrent to the innovative development of the national economy. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(5). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i5.4964
Pasa, B., & DiMatteo, L. (2020). Observations on the impact of technology on Contract Law. In: DiMatteo LA, Cannarsa M, Poncibò C, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Smart Contracts, Blockchain Technology and Digital Platforms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11578/281176
Reimann, M., & Zimmermann, R. (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (2nd edition). Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199296064.001.0001
Shevchuk, O., Matyukhina, N., Babaieva, O., Lysodyed, O., & Davydenko, S. (2023). Conflict of interest in the activities of judges in Ukraine and the European Union: A comparative legal study. Juridical Tribune, 13(2), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/2.06
Skliar, I., Pedchenko, N., Strilec, V., Novikova, V., & Kozmenko, Y. (2020). Assessment of the reforms and programs results of Ukraine’s economy sustainable development by means of neural networks. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(3).2020.07
Stryhul, M., Khomeriki, O., Yahodzinskyi, S., Lyasota, L., & Semenets-Orlova, I. (2019). Peculiarities of development and dynamics of economism and the commercialization of Ukrainian higher education. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(2), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.22
Thomas, G. N. W. (1914). Leading Cases in Workmen's Compensation. Harvard Law Review, 27(3), 295–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/1325996
United Nations Environment Programme. (UNEP). (2019, July). Prosecutors are key to progressing environmental law. Retrieved from https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/prosecutors-are-key-progressing-environmental-law
Wolff, L. C. (2020). The relationship between contract law and property law. Common Law World Review, 49(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473779520903729
Yurkevych, Y. M., Krasnytskyi, I. V., Krupnyk, R. V., Hrushchynska, N. I., & Petronchak, Y. O. (2021). Problems of multidisciplinary regulation of confiscation of property in Ukraine in the conditions of European integration processes. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 3157–3165. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.382
Zavhorodnii, A., Ohiienko, M., Biletska, Y., Bondarenko, S., Duiunova, T., & Bodenchuk, L. (2021). Digitalization of Agribusiness in the Development of Foreign Economic Relations of the Region. Journal of Information Technology Management, 13, 123-141. https://doi.org/10.22059/jitm.2021.82613