Should You Cite Your Own Work? A Caution Against Self-Citation

Self-citation in academic writing is a nuanced issue that can significantly affect how scholarly work is perceived. In some cases, institutional pressures or performance metrics may unintentionally encourage excessive self-citation, which can diminish the perceived value and objectivity of the research.

This practice raises concerns about academic integrity and, in extreme cases, can border on technical plagiarism. Authors should be mindful of their motivations when referencing their own work and aim to uphold honesty and transparency in scholarly communication.

Particularly when publishing with the same journal or publisher, authors should limit citations of their previously published papers. Excessive self-citation in such contexts may appear biased and compromise the neutrality of the research. Instead, citing a broader range of relevant literature can enhance the credibility of the work and demonstrate a well-rounded engagement with the academic community.

Proper citation practices are a cornerstone of ethical research. By understanding and applying these principles, authors can reinforce their commitment to academic standards. Relying too heavily on one’s previous publications may unintentionally signal a limited engagement with wider scholarship and reduce the overall impact of the work.

Moreover, scholars from diverse backgrounds may face varying challenges in navigating citation norms, especially when it comes to referencing their own work. Therefore, maintaining a strategic and balanced approach to self-citation is essential for preserving objectivity, credibility, and scholarly integrity.

To support these goals, authors are advised to avoid citing their previously published work from this publisher whenever possible in future submissions.