FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE THROUGH MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEMS IN RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE: THE MODERATING ROLE OF ACTIVE USE AND PROJECT COMPLEXITY
Main Article Content
Abstract
In project-driven businesses, financial results depend more on an organization's ability to manage activities and information and adapt to operational nuances. Even though management control systems are commonly used to achieve these goals, their impact on financial performance remains a topic of empirical debate, especially when viewed as formal systems rather than actively used managerial tools. This study examines the effects of management control systems on financial performance and whether such effects are increased when management control systems are used proactively and when projects are complex. The study uses a quantitative, hypothetical, deductive method based on a survey conducted with 170 major construction companies operating in Morocco. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis, correlation analysis, and hierarchical multiple regression models. The results suggest a positive, statistically significant relationship between management control systems and financial performance (β = 0.41, p < 0.001). The model's explanatory power improves by adding the variable "active use" (R² = 0.21-0.29); the interaction between "management control systems" and "active use" is also significant (β = 0.19, p < 0.01). This connection is further strengthened by the project's complexity, which also demonstrates a significant interaction effect (β = 0.21, p < 0.01). The final model accounts for 39% of the variability in financial performance. Further results point to the role of management control systems in fostering sustainable growth, economic productivity, and resilient infrastructure development from the perspectives of managerial decision-making and financial performance in a complex project-based environment.
JEL Classification Codes: M10, M41, L74.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Bedford, D. S. (2020). Conceptual and empirical issues in understanding management control combinations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 86, 101187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.101187
Bedford, D. S., Speklé, R. F., & Widener, S. K. (2022). Budgeting and employee stress in times of crisis: Evidence from the Covid-19 pandemic. Accounting, organizations and society, 101, 101346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2022.101346
Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7
Flyvbjerg, B. (2021). Top ten behavioral biases in project management: An overview. Project Management Journal, 52(6), 531-546. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728211049046
Geraldi, J., Maylor, H., & Williams, T. (2011). Now, let's make it really complex (complicated) A systematic review of the complexities of projects. International journal of operations & production management, 31(9), 966–990. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111165848
Giovannoni, E., & Maraghini, M. P. (2013). The challenges of integrated performance measurement systems: Integrating mechanisms for integrated measures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(6), 978-1008. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1312
Hanna, A., & Rajkumar, A. D. (2025). Unveiling the key performance indicators of small and medium-sized enterprises in the food industry: A comprehensive review. Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 10(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.46281/bjmsr.v10i1.2284
Henri, J. F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 529–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.07.001
Islam, M. (2024). Organizational effectiveness for accounting information system practice: A study on some selected ready-made garments factories of Chattogram in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 9(4), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.46281/bjmsr.v9i4.2247
Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2017). Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation and incentives (4th ed.). Pearson.
Mundy, J. (2010). Creating dynamic tensions through a balanced use of management control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(5), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.005
Mir, F. A., & Rezania, D. (2021). The interactive use of management control systems and information technology project performance: a conceptual framework. Accounting Perspectives, 20(4), 719–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12269
Malmi, T., Bedford, D. S., Brühl, R., Dergård, J., Hoozée, S., Janschek, O., & Willert, J. (2022). The use of management controls in different cultural regions: an empirical study of Anglo-Saxon, Germanic and Nordic practices: T. Malmi et al. Journal of Management Control, 33(3), 273–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-022-00342-x
Nguyen, T. T., Mia, L., Winata, L., & Chong, V. K. (2017). Effect of transformational-leadership style and management control system on managerial performance. Journal of Business Research, 70, 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.018
Oyadomari, J. C., Chen, Y. T., Dultra-de-Lima, R. G., & Mendonça, O. R. D. (2023). Exploring the influences of cybernetic and dynamic controls on flexibility and performance. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 20(3), e220170. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2023220170
Simons, R. (1994). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business School Press.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm. European Economic Review, 86, 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.11.006
Tessier, S., & Otley, D. (2012). A conceptual development of Simons’ levers of control framework. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.003
Widener, S. K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 757–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.01.001
Yusoh, N. N. A. M., Mat, T. Z. T., & Abdullah, A. (2024). The impacts of environmental management accounting system (EMAS) adoption phases on sustainability performance: A social issue life cycle theory approach. Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 9(4), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.46281/bjmsr.v9i4.2245